Jump to content
Wolves Daily
  • HASAN: Alex Boone Cut Baffling Without Off-Field Explanation


    Guest Arif Hasan

    The Vikings have cut guard Alex Boone after he started the entire preseason, presumably in favor of Nick Easton at guard. This may have more to do with money than it does "keeping the best 53 on the roster," as Ben Goessling from the Minneapolis Star Tribune explains.

     

    https://twitter.com/GoesslingStrib/status/904067129401643009

     

    Boone was one of the top-40 guards in the NFL last year (ranked 37th by Pro Football Focus, and 30th by Bleacher Report's Top-1000 project), and performed far better by the end of last year than he did at the beginning, when he struggled. In pass protection, Pro Football Focus gave Boone a 97.7 score in Pass Blocking Efficiency, which tied for fifth-best among guards.

     

    Even after a down year in performance as a run blocker, Boone performed like a lineman who deserves to start on a roster.

     

    The Vikings did switch run-blocking schemes this year, and are focusing on zone running in order to best enable players like Dalvin Cook generate additional yards. While Boone is not best positioned to produce in a zone blocking system when compared to his ability in a power blocking setup, he's still performed fairly well in zone running systems.

     

    Most people point to how athletic offensive linemen tend to play better in zone running schemes, but Boone is more athletic than most guards, with a faster 40-yard dash, more explosive vertical leap and quicker agility times than more than half of the guards on NFL rosters. All of those traits have consistently shown up on the field, too.

     

    Boone had a lot of trouble pulling in the preseason, but zone schemes tend to require less pulling than power schemes, and he generally did pretty well on his other assignments. Against the 49ers, he only made two mistakes in his 16 snaps. Though his game against the Bills was poor, he was having a strong training camp and often looked like the best offensive lineman in camp — despite the change in schemes.

     

    Easton, the presumed left guard, had a decent showing against the Seattle Seahawks but had an absolutely terrible time against the 49ers, worse than Boone looked in either preseason game he played in.

     

    While the offensive line looked better overall against the Seahawks without Boone on the roster, his individual play was not the reason why — that would be like arguing that Riley Reiff shouldn't be on the roster, because he didn't play in that game either. Even so, basing that kind of decision on 20-odd snaps is not smart decision-making, especially with evidence to the contrary in other preseason games.

     

    Though Boone was not living up to his $6.7 million contract, the question the Vikings were asking was not whether he was worth $6.7 million, it was whether it was smart to absorb $3.4 million in cap space to cut him, because his contract was partially guaranteed. If the question is entirely on-field, I'm not sure it is. He's a fine guard who had been playing like an above-average lineman for long stretches of time last year, and repeated that performance in training camp. His preseason was up and down, but certainly not definitive, while his competition had a higher rate of poor reps.

     

    The Vikings also have experience with players improving substantially in their second year on the team, with Captain Munnerlyn and Linval Joseph standing as shining examples.

     

    If the Vikings made this decision because of locker room behavior, chemistry or some undisclosed off-field problem, it makes much more sense. The Vikings weren't glowing about his leadership when asked; offensive coordinator Pat Shurmur was asked about Boone's leadership during training camp and gave a less-than-enthusiastic response:

    Well, they all exert what they are as leaders in their own special way. In order to be a leader you just have to have great courage and compete. You don’t have to do anything extraordinary. Sometimes the noisiest guys in the room are the ones that have the longest way to go. But I would say that group is coming together well. They find a way to lead each other.

    Not only that, fans might not have been the only ones annoyed with Boone's affinity for entertaining quotables. Boone's brash behavior isn't entirely an act; it's something that carries over into his everyday interactions with the people around him. If that rubs too many people the wrong way, the Vikings may come to the decision that his worth requires renegotiation. Richie Incognito played well for Miami but was toxic to that locker room. In Buffalo, his strong personality seems to have been a much better fit.

     

    While Boone's strong personality is not likely comparable in its negatives to Incognito by any reasonable means, Incognito's case may demonstrate what coaches are thinking of when they make moves in favor of team chemistry over individual performance.

     

    Another explanation that could be appealing is if the Vikings have a deal in place with another offensive lineman, though that's surprising as well, because the Vikings still chose to absorb half of Boone's cap hit.

     

    If anything, it's most surprising that the Vikings couldn't trade Boone to another team while the league is low on quality offensive linemen. Not getting any return on a lineman who has proven to be starting-quality (and possibly better) is a black mark on the front office.

     


     

    Catch Arif every week on The Andy Luke & Arif Football Machine

    subscribe on itunes

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    I was glad to see him go. I have to assume the team was worn thin with his comments, as I was myself. Maybe its best to cut the cord, and start fresh with a young group and hope for cohesion. We shall see. I do agree that it is not great that Spielman couldn't get anything for him in trade. Very surprising move today.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I agree with Rob. Boone may have been a decent contributor, but if his attitude is going to undermine coaches and affect the locker room, make him an offer you know he'll refuse, then use it as the excuse to cut him. Our line is in transition this season, might as well clean house and start from scratch
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi Arif

     

    Good point it was sloppy of Rick not to trade him for compensation. That was poorly done. Are you hearing anything that they will sign a veteran (you mentioned Greco for example)...It would be shocking/disappointing if Collins (at least at this point, maybe with a year in the PS it would be a different story) is actually on the team.

     

    Also, I know Sirles was bad during training camp, but how did he perform during preseason games? Would he be the one backing up Easton?

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I dont interpret the fact he wasn't traded as a poor job by RS... I interpret it as an indication that Boon was not seen as a player worth 6-7 million/year. While they had to eat 3.4M and another 0.5M to replace his roster spot... they are still saving close to 3M in cap space that will roll into next year and will be very important when resigning that 2015 draft class. Also..I don't really know how to judge OL play..but.... he certainly did not look like an average or above average player to me... he never seemed to get any push, was never on the second level and allowed penetration far too often..but thats from my naive viewpoint... we shall see
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Who is going to trade a pick to take on a $6.7M salary for an average guard? At then end of the day it was whether the Vikings wanted to keep Boone and spend an extra $2.8M over keeping Isidora or Collins instead.

     

    $6.7M for Boone

    $3.4M dead plus $500k roster replacement = $3.9M. Using Isidora or Collins for the replacement, if they bring in someone else the cost would be higher.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I look at this from a broader standpoint.

     

    The team is moving from years of relative freedom in terms of salary cap, to at least several years where it is likely to be salary cap constrained. This move isn't just about Boone. It is about setting expectations, for every player on the roster. The expectation is that you either play to the level of your contract, renegotiate your contract, or are shown the door.

     

    Obviously, there are limitations to that. The team cannot realistically cut players with substantial amounts of guaranteed money on their contract. With Boone, approximately half of his contract was guaranteed, meaning that cutting him increased the cap space available. It would have been better if he had no dead cap hit, but the dead cap hit was not so large as to preclude the team from doing what they did.

     

    Does this all sound ruthless? Well, welcome to the new reality. This is how the team is going to have to manage the salary cap in order to keep the key players together. The message has been repeated more than once: we won't be able to keep everyone. This is what "not being able to keep everyone" looks like.

     

    As to not trading Boone, it is easy to say he should be traded. It is another thing entirely to find someone willing to trade for him. A trade would necessitate the new team taking his $6.7 million contract, at a point in the league year where most teams have used the vast majority of their cap space.

     

    Of course, there is the general problem of perception as well. After last year, the Vikings aren't regarded as having a great offensive live. Unloading a contract of an offensive lineman one year after signing him is going to invite a certain reflexive skepticism, simply as a matter of human nature.

     

    It would be a lot easier to trade a defensive lineman of comparable skill, simply because the perception is that the Vikings have a great defensive line. Psychology plays into transactions a great deal. Few people want what other people don't want, and many people want what they see other people wanting. That is a reality that goes far beyond just football.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    He was going to be cut next year anyway, and he was pretty bad in the preseason. I believe it was against the 49ers he got demolished a couple times in such a way that it basically blew up the play.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    That makes a lot of sense Mike. I tend to disagree with Arif in this instance, although I often do agree with him (us Bloomington guys got to stick together, except for Lane Kiffin). While Arif makes some good points on Boone, I don't think his performance visually reflected the PFF rankings. What I saw often was a guy, who was supposed to be a power guy, getting overpowered constantly by defensive linemen. He wasn't living up to the deal and it's better to cut the cord early than hold onto him too long. Let's see what Easton can do...it can't be worse, and likely will be better.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...