Jump to content
Wolves Daily
  • 2017 Consensus Board: Algorithmically Generated Seven Round Mock


    Guest Arif Hasan

    What if we could model the draft?

     

    It's not a new idea; the people at DraftTek do that essentially everyday, while the folks at Fanspeak, with their On The Clock simulator need to do much the same for you to be able to use their mock draft generator. I decided to give it a stab with the Consensus Big Board.

     

    I asked Steve Shoup at Fanspeak to provide me with the fan voting results for team needs, and I used those, along with historical positional value in the draft, the depth of the draft and the consensus board to create a draft model that would try to fit teams to their needs and the best position available, all while keeping mindful of how deep a draft is at a position.

    RELATED: What Positions Are Deepest in the Draft?

    With all of that together, I created a seven-round mock draft with one constraint: each position could only be drafted once by each time (meaning we don't get a Robert Griffin-Kirk Cousins dynamic), except under fairly unusual circumstances—so teams with multiple needs at the same position may be left in the dust.

     

    The seven-round mock draft below (organized by round in the first gallery and by team in the second gallery) demonstrates the first stab at that approach. It probably overvalues depth, as teams were reaching too much for tackles and undervalued safeties, but for the most part is at least a fun exercise in what HAL might do if it could draft.

     

    That means Cleveland, right?

     

    [gallery columns=1" size="full" td_gallery_title_input="Seven Round Mock Draft" td_select_gallery_slide="slide" ids="12312,12313,12314,12315,12316,12317,12318]

     

    And for team-specific results, look here:

     

    [gallery columns=1" size="full" td_select_gallery_slide="slide" ids="12319,12320,12321,12322,12323,12324,12325,12326,12327,12328,12329,12330,12331,12332,12333,12334,12335,12336,12337,12338,12339,12340,12341,12342,12343,12344,12345,12346,12347,12348,12349,12350]

     


     

    RELATED: Who are the Top 300 Players in the Draft?

    RELATED: Which Big Board Ranked the 2014 Players the Best?

    RELATED: Who is the Most Polarizing Player in the Draft?

    RELATED: What's the Difference Between Forecasting and Evaluating?

    RELATED: Which Big Board Best Predicts the Draft?

    RELATED: Which Positions are Deepest in the Draft?

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    Guest The 2017 Consensus Big Board: Complete 300 Player Rankings | Zone Coverage - Cold Omaha

    Posted

    […] 2017 Consensus Board: Algorithmically Generated Seven Round Mock […]
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    I could like with this draft! Minus TE, covered all of our needs with solid players. Curious how Gibson and Harris’ skill set with translate into the NFL. Gibson ran a 4.3 at his pro day and is a terrific athlete. Harris has a lot of heart and not so much talent, but could be Mike Mauti 2.0. Thanks for another hreat article.. Hal.

     

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...