Jump to content
Wolves Daily
  • It Would be Pretty Cool if the Vikings Acquired Eric Decker


    Guest Arif Hasan

    The New York Jets will soon part ways with touchdown maven Eric Decker from their roster, and are evidently pursuing a retired Steve Smith to fill in the void left by no longer employing their top two receivers. Decker might be released outright or traded to a team for (likely) little value.

     

     

    The Vikings should pursue him if he is released or his trade value is somewhere in the range of a sixth- or seventh-round pick (and they renegotiate his salary). If they don't acquire him, it's probably not a big deal.

     

    In the last five years, Decker has ranked fifth in touchdowns per game of every player with at least 100 receptions over that time period.

     

    Decker, over that time span, ranks fourth in red zone targets, second in red zone receiving touchdowns and seventh among those with at least 50 targets.

     

    The only reason Decker is at all available is because of his injury history, and that does create significant issues. Rotoworld has a good summary of that history in their blurb relating to Adam Schefter's report:

    It's quite the recovery. Decker had extensive hip and shoulder operations when he was injured in Week 3 last season. He was expected to face a rehab deep into summer, but Decker participated fully at OTAs. Now healthy, the Jets are looking to trade him in the next 72 hours or they will cut him. Decker likely prefers the latter so that he can pick his own destination, though he may not get the $14.75 million in salary he's due the next two years if that happens. The Titans and Ravens have been speculated as options.

    In March, there was some doubt that he'd be available for training camp but in May seems to have dispelled doubt and was moving through rehab quickly enough, especially without structural issues.

    When asked if he'll be ready for camp, Decker replied, "Yes, easily. I was surprised when people thought I WASN'T going to be ready."

    It's unusual that the Jets have decided to pursue Smith, if only because parting ways with Decker fits with what has been coined as a "youth movement" by those covering the Jets and the owner himself.

     

    They've let David Harris, Darrelle Revis, Brandon Marshall, Nick Folk and Nick Mangold go as part of that effort.

     

    This likely tells us that Decker's impending release or trade is not solely because of his injury but a combination of factors that has in big part to do with his age (he is 30).

     

    The Vikings have a good handle on their starting receivers -- Stefon Diggs and Adam Thielen. They also have rounded out their depth chart with the additions of Michael Floyd and two late-round receivers and have given first-round pick Laquon Treadwell every opportunity to earn a starting job.

     

    But as third receivers, both Floyd and Treadwell are pretty uncertain. If both of them have about a 20 percent chance of being good receivers, there's only a 36 percent chance overall that you end up with a viable option. Adding a third option brings those chances up to about 50 percent, and that assume Decker is as uncertain as Floyd and Treadwell. The true likelihood is probably closer to 85 or 90 percent.

     

    It's inarguable that a healthy Decker would improve the team. Though the Vikings have substantially improved their run game, it seems likely that they won't revert to a scheme featuring a fullback, which means they have ample opportunity to field three receivers along with a running back and tight end.

     

    Last year, the average team rolled out 2.6 receivers per play, with seven teams playing with more than 2.75 receivers per play. It would be fairly easy for the Vikings to split 900 snaps between three receivers. Adam Thielen, after all, led Vikings receivers with 879.

     

    This would create a crowded receiver room, there's little doubt about that -- but it's pretty unlikely that any receiver whose position is now at risk would have contributed much anyway.

     

    The Vikings have now carried six receivers on opening day for three consecutive years -- and the increasing likelihood that the fullback position is no longer relevant for the team opens up another slot for a player like a bottom-of-the-roster receiver.

     

    Not only that, it would be pretty neat for the Vikings to have the best player to come from the University of Minnesota since Karl Mecklenberg -- and before that, Carl Eller.

     

    The Vikings have about $14 million in cap space, so it's certainly possible for them to absorb a reduced Decker contract and it would make the team better at the primary skill they've lacked in-- producing receiving touchdowns -- for over a decade. The last receiver to produce double-digit touchdowns for more than one season for the Vikings was Randy Moss.

     

    It wouldn't be a failure for the franchise to ignore the opportunity, but why not?

     


     

    Catch Arif every week on The Andy Luke & Arif Football Machine

    subscribe on itunes

    Think you could write a story like this? Hockey Wilderness wants you to develop your voice, find an audience, and we'll pay you to do it. Just fill out this form.


    User Feedback

    Recommended Comments

    How exactly does this math work?

     

    If both of them have about a 20 percent chance of being good receivers, there’s only a 36 percent chance overall that you end up with a viable option. Adding a third option rockets those chances up to 88 percent.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    If each receiver has a 20 percent chance of being good, then they have an 80 percent chance of being bad. The odds of both being bad are 80% times 80%, which is 64%. That means the odds of one of them being good is 1 minus .64, or 36%. If it's three receivers instead of two, the odds of all three being bad are .8 times .8 times .8, which comes out to 12.5%.
    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Arif, .8 * .8 * .8 comes out to 51.2%, not 12.5%.

     

    Did enjoy the article and agree with your overall logic!

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Decker is probably a better option than Floyd or at least can compete with him and everyone else for a spot why couldn’t we find room to at least let him compete? Especially given the Vikes struggles in the redzone?
    Sounds like we aren’t interested (with a little “wink wink the door is still open”)…
    I get we have plenty of depth but how can he not at least be considered reliable competition to improve the team? There has to be some position somewhere that we can trim and look back at comparable later if need be.

    Decker is a good punt returner and special teamed too, right? Find a spot for him.

    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


×
×
  • Create New...